SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Bibliocommons

Other Library systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Bibliocommons does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Bibliocommons on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Bibliocommons has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Bibliocommons does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Bibliocommons does notBibliocommons publishes, and they do not
OverDriveoverdrive.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Clarivateclarivate.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
EBSCOebsco.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Springsharespringshare.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Bibliothecabibliotheca.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hooplahoopladigital.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Liberoliberolms.com 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Atriuumbooksys.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Ex Librisexlibrisgroup.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Allegroallegro-c.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Primasoftprimasoft.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Lyngsoelyngsoesystems.com 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.