Transparency alternatives to Braintrust
Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Braintrust. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Braintrust on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Braintrust has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Braintrust” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Braintrust | Found at Braintrust, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langfuselangfuse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Langfuse | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Orqorq.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Orq | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zepgetzep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zep | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Lakeralakera.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lakera | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LangWatchlangwatch.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to LangWatch | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Confident AIconfident-ai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Confident AI | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Openlayeropenlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openlayer | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Vectorizevectorize.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorize | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Difydify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dify | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Arizearize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arize | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| HiddenLayerhiddenlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HiddenLayer | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Patronus AIpatronus.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Patronus AI | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.