Transparency alternatives to Orq
Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Orq does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Orq on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Orq has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Orq does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Orq does not | Orq publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langfuselangfuse.com | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Lunarylunary.ai | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Openlayeropenlayer.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fiddlerfiddler.ai | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Zepgetzep.com | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Braintrustbraintrust.dev | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Mastramastra.ai | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Vectorizevectorize.io | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Confident AIconfident-ai.com | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Lakeralakera.ai | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| HiddenLayerhiddenlayer.com | 26/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LangWatchlangwatch.ai | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.