Transparency alternatives to Langfuse
Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Langfuse. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Langfuse on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Langfuse has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Langfuse” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Langfuse | Found at Langfuse, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orqorq.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Orq | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zepgetzep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zep | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Vectorizevectorize.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorize | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Lakeralakera.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lakera | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| LangWatchlangwatch.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to LangWatch | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Freeplayfreeplay.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Freeplay | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| LastMile AIlastmileai.devSee also Transparency alternatives to LastMile AI | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Pareaparea.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Parea | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Vellumvellum.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vellum | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Lunarylunary.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lunary | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Confident AIconfident-ai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Confident AI | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Openlayeropenlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openlayer | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.