SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Langfuse

Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Langfuse does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Langfuse on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Langfuse has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Langfuse does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Langfuse does notLangfuse publishes, and they do not
Lakeralakera.ai 35/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare
Freeplayfreeplay.ai 17/100 1 Status page with history 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
LastMile AIlastmileai.dev 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
Confident AIconfident-ai.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Openlayeropenlayer.com 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Fiddlerfiddler.ai 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Arizearize.com 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Braintrustbraintrust.dev 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
HiddenLayerhiddenlayer.com 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Lunarylunary.ai 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Patronus AIpatronus.ai 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Galileogalileo.ai 30/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.