Transparency alternatives to Freeplay
Other LLM tooling and evaluation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Freeplay. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Freeplay on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Freeplay has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Freeplay” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Freeplay | Found at Freeplay, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langfuselangfuse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Langfuse | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Orqorq.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Orq | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Lunarylunary.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lunary | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Confident AIconfident-ai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Confident AI | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Openlayeropenlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openlayer | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Fiddlerfiddler.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Fiddler | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| LangWatchlangwatch.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to LangWatch | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zepgetzep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zep | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Braintrustbraintrust.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Braintrust | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Mastramastra.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Mastra | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Difydify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dify | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Arizearize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arize | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.