SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Equals

Other Low-code and internal tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Equals. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Equals on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Equals has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Equals” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at EqualsFound at Equals, not found there
Forest Adminforestadmin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forest Admin 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Retoolretool.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Retool 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Caspiocaspio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caspio 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pegapega.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pega 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Teableteable.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Teable 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Mendixmendix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mendix 52/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Superblockssuperblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Superblocks 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Budibasebudibase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Budibase 48/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Agilebaseagilebase.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Agilebase 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Betty Blocksbettyblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betty Blocks 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
DronaHQdronahq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DronaHQ 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
RUAL Corerual.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to RUAL Core 35/100 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.