SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to GoodBarber

Other Low-code and internal tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GoodBarber does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from GoodBarber on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

GoodBarber has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and GoodBarber does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and GoodBarber does notGoodBarber publishes, and they do not
Retoolretool.com 61/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Caspiocaspio.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Mendixmendix.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Forest Adminforestadmin.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Pegapega.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Superblockssuperblocks.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Betty Blocksbettyblocks.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Budibasebudibase.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
UI Bakeryuibakery.io 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Agilebaseagilebase.co.uk 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Kohezionkohezion.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
DronaHQdronahq.com 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.