SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Ninox

Other Low-code and internal tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ninox. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Ninox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ninox has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Ninox” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at NinoxFound at Ninox, not found there
Retoolretool.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Retool 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Caspiocaspio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caspio 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Forest Adminforestadmin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forest Admin 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Mendixmendix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mendix 52/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Pegapega.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pega 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Jet Adminjetadmin.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jet Admin 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
OutSystemsoutsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OutSystems 24/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Superblockssuperblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Superblocks 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named nothing Compare
Betty Blocksbettyblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betty Blocks 48/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Budibasebudibase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Budibase 48/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
DronaHQdronahq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DronaHQ 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Xanoxano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xano 35/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.