SaaS Ranking
Menu

OutSystems: what they publish

outsystems.com · Low-code and internal tools · checked 2026-10-15

24/100FBand F

Rank 27 of 47 in Low-code and internal tools, where the median is 26.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-15. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

4 days since the newest dated result, 4 since the oldest. 11 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

OutSystems

outsystems.com · Low-code and internal tools

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 24of 100 Rank 27 of 47

Published commitments3 of 8 found, 1 not measured

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that OutSystems has no such document.

Where OutSystems sits in Low-code and internal tools

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C3 6%
  4. D7 15%
  5. E15 32%
  6. F22 47%
47 vendors with a score; 1 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of OutSystems is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What OutSystems states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://outsystems.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://outsystems.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://outsystems.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://outsystems.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://outsystems.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://outsystems.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Low-code and internal tools: 5 of 47 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://outsystems.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://outsystems.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://outsystems.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://outsystems.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://outsystems.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Low-code and internal tools: 4 of 47 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://outsystems.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://outsystems.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://outsystems.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://outsystems.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://outsystems.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in Low-code and internal tools: 17 of 47 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://outsystems.com/ – redirects to https://outsystems.com/
  2. https://outsystems.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Low-code and internal tools: 31 of 47 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: 338-pnw-019.mktoresp.com, ajax.googleapis.com, analytics.ahrefs.com, cdn.cookielaw.org, cdn.intellimize.co, cdn.jsdelivr.net, cdn.prod.website-files.com, challenges.cloudflare.com, d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, geolocation.onetrust.com, js.zi-scripts.com, marketo.use1-marketplace-1p-apps-prod-red.if.webflow.services, munchkin.marketo.net, unpkg.com, ws-assets.zoominfo.com, ws.zoominfo.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Low-code and internal tools: 4 of 45 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://outsystems.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://outsystems.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://outsystems.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://outsystems.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://outsystems.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://outsystems.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Low-code and internal tools: 6 of 47 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://outsystems.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://outsystems.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://outsystems.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://outsystems.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Low-code and internal tools: 1 of 47 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 4
✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.outsystems.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Status page with history in Low-code and internal tools: 9 of 46 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page FedRAMP (unclear from the sentence), HIPAA (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 27001, PCI DSS (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II. The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 6 exact wordings

    Build with confidence on a vetted security foundation powered by a platform that is FedRAMP Authorized and certified for national standards including ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), and DESC (UAE).

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

    ns, including GDPR, the EU Data Act, the EU AI Act, and other privacy and industry mandates such as HIPAA and PCI DSS.

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

    journey by leveraging our audited controls and credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 22301.

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

    certification journey by leveraging our audited controls and credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 22301.

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

    ing GDPR, the EU Data Act, the EU AI Act, and other privacy and industry mandates such as HIPAA and PCI DSS.

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

    Streamline your certification journey by leveraging our audited controls and credentials, including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 22301.

    Read at https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security

Source: https://www.outsystems.com/platform/security · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Certifications named in Low-code and internal tools: 15 of 47 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://www.outsystems.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Low-code and internal tools: 5 of 46 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.outsystems.com/legal/terms-of-use/privacy-statement · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Low-code and internal tools: 21 of 47 companies

Not measured by us 1
–

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Not measured. The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://outsystems.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://outsystems.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://outsystems.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://outsystems.com/en/pricing – excluded by robots.txt
  5. https://outsystems.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Low-code and internal tools: 36 of 46 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-08: 24 of 1002026-10-15: 24 of 100 2026-10-08 2026-10-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured OutSystems in: 24 (2026-10-08), 24 (2026-10-15).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

OutSystems

4 found · 7 not found · 1 not measured across 12 public checks.

11 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-15.

Investigate 8 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  3. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  4. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  5. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  6. HTTPS enforced with HSTS

    How is HTTPS enforced on the product and sign-in domains we will use? Please distinguish those domains from the public website.

    Inspect this check
  7. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  8. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.