Transparency alternatives to Open Loyalty
Other Loyalty and rewards vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Open Loyalty. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Open Loyalty on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Open Loyalty has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Open Loyalty” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Open Loyalty | Found at Open Loyalty, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yotpoyotpo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yotpo | 74/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Voucherifyvoucherify.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Voucherify | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Okendookendo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Okendo | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Joyjoy.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Joy | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Talon.Onetalon.oneSee also Transparency alternatives to Talon.One | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| TrueLoyaltrueloyal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrueLoyal | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| LoyaltyLionloyaltylion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LoyaltyLion | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stamp Mestampme.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stamp Me | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Marsellomarsello.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Marsello | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Growavegrowave.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Growave | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Paytronixpaytronix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paytronix | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Piggypiggy.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Piggy | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.