Transparency alternatives to Dub
Other Marketing attribution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dub. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Dub on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dub has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Dub” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Dub | Found at Dub, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supermetricssupermetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supermetrics | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cometlycometly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cometly | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Treasure Datatreasuredata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasure Data | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| AppsFlyerappsflyer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AppsFlyer | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ReportGardenreportgarden.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReportGarden | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clarisightsclarisights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarisights | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Funnelfunnel.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Funnel | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Northbeamnorthbeam.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Northbeam | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Short.ioshort.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Short.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Tealiumtealium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tealium | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Dreamdatadreamdata.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Dreamdata | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Hyroshyros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyros | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.