Transparency alternatives to Dub
Other Marketing attribution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Dub does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Dub on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dub has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Dub does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Dub does not | Dub publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supermetricssupermetrics.com | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cometlycometly.com | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tealiumtealium.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Treasure Datatreasuredata.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Northbeamnorthbeam.io | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| AppsFlyerappsflyer.com | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ReportGardenreportgarden.com | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clarisightsclarisights.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Funnelfunnel.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Dreamdatadreamdata.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Short.ioshort.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Zeotapzeotap.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.