Alternatives to Porter Metrics
Other Marketing attribution vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Porter Metrics does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Porter Metrics on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Porter Metrics has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Porter Metrics does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Porter Metrics does not | Porter Metrics publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cometlycometly.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Supermetricssupermetrics.com | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Tealiumtealium.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Analyzifyanalyzify.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Factors.aifactors.ai | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| HockeyStackhockeystack.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| BlueConicblueconic.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Northbeamnorthbeam.io | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Funnelfunnel.io | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Treasure Datatreasuredata.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Hyroshyros.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Improvadoimprovado.io | 30/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.