SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ChiroTouch

Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ChiroTouch does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 84 that differ from ChiroTouch on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ChiroTouch has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and ChiroTouch does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ChiroTouch does notChiroTouch publishes, and they do not
Nookalnookal.com 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Clinikocliniko.com 43/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Semblesemble.io 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Heidi Healthheidihealth.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Doctenadoctena.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
SimplePracticesimplepractice.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
DocEngagedocengage.in 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Doctolibdoctolib.de 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Duriaduria.de 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
samedisamedi.de 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
CGMcgm.com 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Teleclinicteleclinic.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.