Transparency alternatives to RPMGlobal
Other Mining operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at RPMGlobal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from RPMGlobal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
RPMGlobal has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at RPMGlobal” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at RPMGlobal | Found at RPMGlobal, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyno Nobeldynonobel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dyno Nobel | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| VRIFYvrify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VRIFY | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sandvik Miningsandvik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sandvik Mining | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deswikdeswik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deswik | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Petra Datapetradatascience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Petra Data | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Quartexquartexsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartex | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Wencowencomine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wenco | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Idobaidoba.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Idoba | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Imdeximdexlimited.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imdex | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Komatsu Smartkomatsu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Komatsu Smart | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Krux Analyticskruxanalytics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Krux Analytics | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Metsometso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metso | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.