Transparency alternatives to Sandvik Mining
Other Mining operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sandvik Mining. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Sandvik Mining on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sandvik Mining has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sandvik Mining” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sandvik Mining | Found at Sandvik Mining, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPMGlobalrpmglobal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RPMGlobal | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| VRIFYvrify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VRIFY | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Quartexquartexsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartex | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Dyno Nobeldynonobel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dyno Nobel | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Deswikdeswik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deswik | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Petra Datapetradatascience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Petra Data | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Wencowencomine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wenco | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Maptekmaptek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Maptek | 5/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dataminedataminesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datamine | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| MineHubminehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MineHub | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Idobaidoba.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Idoba | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Imdeximdexlimited.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imdex | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.