SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Sandvik Mining

Other Mining operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sandvik Mining does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Sandvik Mining on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sandvik Mining has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Sandvik Mining does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sandvik Mining does notSandvik Mining publishes, and they do not
MST Globalmstglobal.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
RPMGlobalrpmglobal.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Wencowencomine.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Maptekmaptek.com 18/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dyno Nobeldynonobel.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Deswikdeswik.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Petra Datapetradatascience.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dataminedataminesoftware.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
MineHubminehub.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Idobaidoba.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Imdeximdexlimited.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Komatsu Smartkomatsu.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.