Transparency alternatives to Metaflow
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Metaflow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Metaflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Metaflow has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Metaflow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Metaflow | Found at Metaflow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Anyscaleanyscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyscale | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Paperspacepaperspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paperspace | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Nebiusnebius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nebius | 30/100 | 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| CoreWeavecoreweave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CoreWeave | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Cometcomet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comet | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| DataRobotdatarobot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataRobot | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.