SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to GridGain Control Center

Other Monitoring and observability vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GridGain Control Center does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from GridGain Control Center on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

GridGain Control Center has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and GridGain Control Center does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and GridGain Control Center does notGridGain Control Center publishes, and they do not
Sentrysentry.io 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Honeycombhoneycomb.io 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 1 Data location stated Compare
Datadogdatadoghq.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
OpenObserveopenobserve.ai 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
New Relicnewrelic.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Sumo Logicsumologic.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
OneUptimeoneuptime.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pulseticpulsetic.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Rollbarrollbar.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Better Stackbetterstack.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
UptimeRobotuptimerobot.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Coralogixcoralogix.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.