SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Middleware

Other Monitoring and observability vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Middleware. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 46 that differ from Middleware on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Middleware has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Middleware” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MiddlewareFound at Middleware, not found there
Sentrysentry.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sentry 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
OpenObserveopenobserve.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenObserve 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Honeycombhoneycomb.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Honeycomb 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
OneUptimeoneuptime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneUptime 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Datadogdatadoghq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datadog 74/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Rollbarrollbar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rollbar 73/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Sumo Logicsumologic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sumo Logic 70/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
New Relicnewrelic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to New Relic 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Chronospherechronosphere.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronosphere 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pulseticpulsetic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pulsetic 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Better Stackbetterstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Better Stack 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Coralogixcoralogix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coralogix 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.