SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to StatusGator

Other Monitoring and observability vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that StatusGator does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from StatusGator on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

StatusGator has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and StatusGator does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and StatusGator does notStatusGator publishes, and they do not
Sentrysentry.io 74/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
OpenObserveopenobserve.ai 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Honeycombhoneycomb.io 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Pulseticpulsetic.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Rollbarrollbar.com 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
Better Stackbetterstack.com 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
New Relicnewrelic.com 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
UptimeRobotuptimerobot.com 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
OneUptimeoneuptime.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Chronospherechronosphere.io 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Datadogdatadoghq.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Sumo Logicsumologic.com 57/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.