SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Interhyp

Other Lending and mortgage software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Interhyp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Interhyp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Interhyp has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Interhyp does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Interhyp does notInterhyp publishes, and they do not
Floifyfloify.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Drooms Lendingdrooms.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Moxomoxo.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Encompassicemortgagetechnology.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Mambumambu.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Meridianlinkmeridianlink.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Q2q2.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Lendingpadlendingpad.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nortridgenortridge.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Banxwarebanxware.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Fiservfiserv.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Blendblend.com 22/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.