Alternatives to TP-Link Omada
Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TP-Link Omada does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from TP-Link Omada on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TP-Link Omada has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and TP-Link Omada does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and TP-Link Omada does not | TP-Link Omada publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kentikkentik.com | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Auvikauvik.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SonicWallsonicwall.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Paesslerpaessler.com | 43/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Catchpointcatchpoint.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Netgear Insightnetgear.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ubiquitiui.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cambiumcambiumnetworks.com | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Domotzdomotz.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Obkioobkio.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Netskopenetskope.com | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.