SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Zyxel Nebula

Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Zyxel Nebula does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Zyxel Nebula on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Zyxel Nebula has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Zyxel Nebula does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Zyxel Nebula does notZyxel Nebula publishes, and they do not
LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Kentikkentik.com 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Auvikauvik.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Paesslerpaessler.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Catchpointcatchpoint.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Netgear Insightnetgear.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Cambiumcambiumnetworks.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Nile Networksnilesecure.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Obkioobkio.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Aristaarista.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Netskopenetskope.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Domotzdomotz.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.