Alternatives to Parkster
Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Parkster does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 20 that differ from Parkster on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Parkster has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Parkster does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Parkster does not | Parkster publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designadesigna.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Justparkjustpark.com | 24/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Parkmobileparkmobile.io | 13/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Easyparkeasypark.net | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Parkwhizparkwhiz.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Paybyphonepaybyphone.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Wemolowemolo.com | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Passportpassportinc.com | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Peter Parkpeter-park.de | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Apcoaapcoa.de | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Contiparkcontipark.de | 10/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ampidoampido.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.