SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Parkwhiz

Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Parkwhiz does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Parkwhiz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Parkwhiz has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Parkwhiz does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Parkwhiz does notParkwhiz publishes, and they do not
Justparkjustpark.com 24/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Designadesigna.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Wemolowemolo.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Parkmobileparkmobile.io 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Parksterparkster.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Passportpassportinc.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Peter Parkpeter-park.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Apcoaapcoa.de 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Easyparkeasypark.net 17/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Paybyphonepaybyphone.com 17/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Contiparkcontipark.de 10/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Status page with history Compare
Ampidoampido.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.