Transparency alternatives to Q-Park
Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Q-Park. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Q-Park on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Q-Park has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Q-Park” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Q-Park | Found at Q-Park, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkableparkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parkable | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Justparkjustpark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Justpark | 24/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Designadesigna.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Designa | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Parkmobileparkmobile.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Parkmobile | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| netParknetpark.usSee also Transparency alternatives to netPark | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Parkalotparkalot.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Parkalot | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Paybyphonepaybyphone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paybyphone | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Skidataskidata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skidata | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Easyparkeasypark.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Easypark | 19/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scheidt Bachmannscheidt-bachmann.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Scheidt Bachmann | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Wemolowemolo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wemolo | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Parksterparkster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parkster | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.