SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Q-Park

Other Parking management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Q-Park does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Q-Park on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Q-Park has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Q-Park does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Q-Park does notQ-Park publishes, and they do not
Justparkjustpark.com 24/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Designadesigna.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Skidataskidata.com 22/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Easyparkeasypark.net 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Parkwhizparkwhiz.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Paybyphonepaybyphone.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Scheidt Bachmannscheidt-bachmann.de 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Wemolowemolo.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Parksterparkster.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Spotherospothero.com 14/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Parkmobileparkmobile.io 13/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Passportpassportinc.com 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.