SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Gr4vy

Other Payment orchestration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Gr4vy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Gr4vy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gr4vy has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Gr4vy does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Gr4vy does notGr4vy publishes, and they do not
IXOPAYixopay.com 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Spreedlyspreedly.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Marqetamarqeta.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Corefycorefy.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Increaseincrease.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
BR-DGEbr-dge.to 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Payrailspayrails.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Primerprimer.io 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Nomupaynomupay.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Weavrweavr.io 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Modulrmodulrfinance.com 26/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Payneteasypayneteasy.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.