SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Solaris

Other Payment orchestration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Solaris does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from Solaris on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Solaris has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Solaris does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Solaris does notSolaris publishes, and they do not
Rebillyrebilly.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
IXOPAYixopay.com 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Spreedlyspreedly.com 43/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Increaseincrease.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
TrueLayertruelayer.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Marqetamarqeta.com 39/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Unitunit.co 39/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Corefycorefy.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Modulrmodulrfinance.com 26/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Primerprimer.io 26/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Nomupaynomupay.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Silverflowsilverflow.com 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.