Transparency alternatives to Aleyant
Other Print and packaging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Aleyant. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from Aleyant on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Aleyant has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Aleyant” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Aleyant | Found at Aleyant, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threekitthreekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Threekit | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smart Communicationssmartcommunications.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smart Communications | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Printboxgetprintbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Printbox | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| WilcomWorkspacewilcom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WilcomWorkspace | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Prinectheidelberg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prinect | 27/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onlineprintersonlineprinters.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Onlineprinters | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pitney Bowespitneybowes.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitney Bowes | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vistaprint Partnercimpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vistaprint Partner | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Compliscomplis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Complis | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Eskoesko.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Esko | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Flyeralarmflyeralarm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flyeralarm | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SEAL Systemssealsystems.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SEAL Systems | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.