Transparency alternatives to WilcomWorkspace
Other Print and packaging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at WilcomWorkspace. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from WilcomWorkspace on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
WilcomWorkspace has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at WilcomWorkspace” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at WilcomWorkspace | Found at WilcomWorkspace, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threekitthreekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Threekit | 48/100 | 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Smart Communicationssmartcommunications.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smart Communications | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Printboxgetprintbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Printbox | 30/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Teesomteesom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesom | 27/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Francotyp-Postaliafp-francotyp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Francotyp-Postalia | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Printixprintix.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Printix | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Vjoonvjoon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vjoon | 26/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Printplusprintplus.chSee also Transparency alternatives to Printplus | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Onlineprintersonlineprinters.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Onlineprinters | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Vistaprint Partnercimpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vistaprint Partner | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Kernkern.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Kern | 13/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Kickflipgokickflip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kickflip | 32/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.