Alternatives to ConductorOne
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ConductorOne does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from ConductorOne on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ConductorOne has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and ConductorOne does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ConductorOne does not | ConductorOne publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Indentindent.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| NordLayernordlayer.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Heimdalheimdalsecurity.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Netwrixnetwrix.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Britivebritive.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +4 | Compare |
| Aponoapono.io | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +4 | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.