Alternatives to Netwrix
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Netwrix does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Netwrix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Netwrix has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Netwrix does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Netwrix does not | Netwrix publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ConductorOneconductorone.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Oleriaoleria.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Cyolocyolo.io | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Indentindent.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Silverfortsilverfort.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.