Alternatives to Devolutions
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Devolutions does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Devolutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Devolutions has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Devolutions does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Devolutions does not | Devolutions publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConductorOneconductorone.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Infisicalinfisical.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cyolocyolo.io | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Indentindent.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| NordLayernordlayer.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oleriaoleria.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Heimdalheimdalsecurity.com | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.