SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Upvoty

Other Product feedback and updates vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Upvoty does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 14 that differ from Upvoty on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Upvoty has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Upvoty does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Upvoty does notUpvoty publishes, and they do not
AnnounceKitannouncekit.app 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
ProductLiftproductlift.dev 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Releasedreleased.so 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Frillfrill.co 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Featurebasefeaturebase.app 26/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Roadmaproadmap.space 35/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cannycanny.io 23/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Beamergetbeamer.com 22/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
UserJotuserjot.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Changelogfychangelogfy.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Noticeablenoticeable.io 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Feedback Fishfeedback.fish 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.