SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to UserJot

Other Product feedback and updates vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that UserJot does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 14 that differ from UserJot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

UserJot has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and UserJot does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and UserJot does notUserJot publishes, and they do not
AnnounceKitannouncekit.app 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
ProductLiftproductlift.dev 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Releasedreleased.so 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Frillfrill.co 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Roadmaproadmap.space 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Featurebasefeaturebase.app 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Upvotyupvoty.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Cannycanny.io 23/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Beamergetbeamer.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Changelogfychangelogfy.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Noticeablenoticeable.io 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Feedback Fishfeedback.fish 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.