Transparency alternatives to Changelogfy
Other Product feedback and updates vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Changelogfy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 13 that differ from Changelogfy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Changelogfy has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Changelogfy” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Changelogfy | Found at Changelogfy, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AnnounceKitannouncekit.appSee also Transparency alternatives to AnnounceKit | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| ProductLiftproductlift.devSee also Transparency alternatives to ProductLift | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Releasedreleased.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Released | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Frillfrill.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Frill | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| UserJotuserjot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UserJot | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Featurebasefeaturebase.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Featurebase | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Roadmaproadmap.spaceSee also Transparency alternatives to Roadmap | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Upvotyupvoty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Upvoty | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cannycanny.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Canny | 23/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Beamergetbeamer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamer | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Noticeablenoticeable.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Noticeable | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Feedback Fishfeedback.fishSee also Transparency alternatives to Feedback Fish | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.