Transparency alternatives to data.world
Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at data.world. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from data.world on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
data.world has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at data.world” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at data.world | Found at data.world, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodasoda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Soda | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Siffletsiffletdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sifflet | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Alationalation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alation | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Ataccamaataccama.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ataccama | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Castorcastordoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| GoDataFeedgodatafeed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoDataFeed | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Atlanatlan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlan | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Fozzelsfozzels.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fozzels | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Monte Carlomontecarlodata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monte Carlo | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Reltioreltio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reltio | 39/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DataFeedWatchdatafeedwatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataFeedWatch | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Plytixplytix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plytix | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.