Transparency alternatives to Prospero
Other Proposals and quoting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Prospero. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Prospero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Prospero has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Prospero” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Prospero | Found at Prospero, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AutoRFPautorfp.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to AutoRFP | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Scoroscoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scoro | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| QorusDocsqorusdocs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to QorusDocs | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Responsiveresponsive.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Responsive | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Qwilrqwilr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qwilr | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Arphiearphie.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Arphie | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Loopioloopio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loopio | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| PROSpros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PROS | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Foveatefoveate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foveate | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Mercuramercura.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mercura | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Omnia Retailomniaretail.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Omnia Retail | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Proposifyproposify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Proposify | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.