SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Interfolio

Other Research administration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Interfolio. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Interfolio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Interfolio has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Interfolio” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at InterfolioFound at Interfolio, not found there
Watermarkwatermarkinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Watermark 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
LabArchiveslabarchives.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LabArchives 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Cayusecayuse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cayuse 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Protocols.ioprotocols.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Protocols.io 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Pure Elsevierelsevier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pure Elsevier 32/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Colabracolabra.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Colabra 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Aixeloaixelo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aixelo 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
SciNotescinote.netSee also Transparency alternatives to SciNote 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Key Solutionskeyusa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Key Solutions 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Altmetricaltmetric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Altmetric 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Dimensionsdimensions.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dimensions 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Kualikuali.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kuali 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.