SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Watermark

Other Research administration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Watermark does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Watermark on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Watermark has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Watermark does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Watermark does notWatermark publishes, and they do not
Colabracolabra.app 26/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
LabArchiveslabarchives.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Protocols.ioprotocols.io 35/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Interfoliointerfolio.com 4/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Cayusecayuse.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Pure Elsevierelsevier.com 32/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Aixeloaixelo.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
SciNotescinote.net 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Key Solutionskeyusa.com 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Dimensionsdimensions.ai 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Kualikuali.co 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Effex OMARSeffex.app 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.