SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to LabArchives

Other Research administration vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at LabArchives. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from LabArchives on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LabArchives has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at LabArchives” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LabArchivesFound at LabArchives, not found there
Watermarkwatermarkinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Watermark 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Cayusecayuse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cayuse 35/100 1 Status page with history 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Colabracolabra.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Colabra 26/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
SciNotescinote.netSee also Transparency alternatives to SciNote 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Altmetricaltmetric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Altmetric 17/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Dimensionsdimensions.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dimensions 17/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Kualikuali.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kuali 17/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Interfoliointerfolio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Interfolio 4/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Protocols.ioprotocols.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Protocols.io 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
Pure Elsevierelsevier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pure Elsevier 32/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Aixeloaixelo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aixelo 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Key Solutionskeyusa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Key Solutions 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.