SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Healthrise

Other Healthcare revenue cycle vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Healthrise. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Healthrise on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Healthrise has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Healthrise” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at HealthriseFound at Healthrise, not found there
Enterenter.healthSee also Transparency alternatives to Enter 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
CollaborateMDcollaboratemd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CollaborateMD 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
AdvancedMDadvancedmd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AdvancedMD 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Availityavaility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Availity 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Candid Healthjoincandidhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Candid Health 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Cedarcedar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cedar 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
CodaMetrixcodametrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CodaMetrix 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Noble Directnobledirect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Noble Direct 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
AKASAakasa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AKASA 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Fathomfathomhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
FinThrivefinthrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FinThrive 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Med-Metrixmed-metrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Med-Metrix 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.