SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Blue Prism

Other Robotic process automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Blue Prism. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Blue Prism on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Blue Prism has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Blue Prism” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Blue PrismFound at Blue Prism, not found there
Uniphoreuniphore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uniphore 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Robomotionrobomotion.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Robomotion 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hypersciencehyperscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperscience 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Netcallnetcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netcall 35/100 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ai Multipleaimultiple.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ai Multiple 30/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Datamaticsdatamatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datamatics 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Automation Heroautomationhero.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Automation Hero 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Redwoodredwood.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redwood 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
WorkFusionworkfusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WorkFusion 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sema4.aisema4.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sema4.ai 18/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Laiyelaiye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laiye 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Taguiaisingapore.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Tagui 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.