Transparency alternatives to Robomotion
Other Robotic process automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Robomotion does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Robomotion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Robomotion has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Robomotion does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Robomotion does not | Robomotion publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniphoreuniphore.com | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hypersciencehyperscience.com | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Electroneekelectroneek.com | 10/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Ai Multipleaimultiple.com | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Sema4.aisema4.ai | 18/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Argos Labsargos-labs.com | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Redwoodredwood.com | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Automation Heroautomationhero.ai | 13/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Blue Prismblueprism.com | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Epianceepiance.com | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Datamaticsdatamatics.com | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Netcallnetcall.com | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.