Transparency alternatives to Robomotion
Other Robotic process automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Robomotion. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Robomotion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Robomotion has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Robomotion” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Robomotion | Found at Robomotion, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniphoreuniphore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uniphore | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hypersciencehyperscience.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperscience | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Electroneekelectroneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Electroneek | 10/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Ai Multipleaimultiple.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ai Multiple | 30/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Sema4.aisema4.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sema4.ai | 18/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Redwoodredwood.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redwood | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Blue Prismblueprism.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blue Prism | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Argos Labsargos-labs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Argos Labs | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Epianceepiance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Epiance | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Netcallnetcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netcall | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Datamaticsdatamatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datamatics | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Automation Heroautomationhero.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Automation Hero | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.