SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Epiance

Other Robotic process automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Epiance does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Epiance on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Epiance has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Epiance does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Epiance does notEpiance publishes, and they do not
Uniphoreuniphore.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Hypersciencehyperscience.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Netcallnetcall.com 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ai Multipleaimultiple.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Automation Heroautomationhero.ai 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ipsoftipsoft.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Blue Prismblueprism.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Datamaticsdatamatics.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Laiyelaiye.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Redwoodredwood.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Electroneekelectroneek.com 10/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Argos Labsargos-labs.com 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.