Alternatives to Dealfront
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Dealfront does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Dealfront on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dealfront has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Dealfront does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Dealfront does not | Dealfront publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.com | 74/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.com | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Outreachoutreach.io | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.com | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.com | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.io | 57/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Clariclari.com | 48/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Gonggong.io | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Fathomfathom.video | 57/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Albacrossalbacross.com | 52/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.ai | 52/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.