SaaS Ranking
Menu

Clearbit: what they publish

clearbit.com · Sales engagement · checked 2026-10-12

65/100CBand C

Rank 5 of 56 in Sales engagement, where the median is 33.5.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-12. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

5 days since the newest dated result, 5 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Clearbit

clearbit.com · Sales engagement

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 65of 100 Rank 5 of 56

Published commitments7 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-12. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Clearbit has no such document.

Where Clearbit sits in Sales engagement

  1. A0 0%
  2. B4 7%
  3. C9 16%
  4. D9 16%
  5. E13 23%
  6. F21 38%
56 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Clearbit is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Clearbit states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-12.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://clearbit.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://clearbit.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://clearbit.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://clearbit.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://clearbit.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://clearbit.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://clearbit.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://clearbit.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Sales engagement: 18 of 56 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://app.clearbit.com/auth/login · checked 2026-10-12

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://clearbit.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://clearbit.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://clearbit.com/plans – found, but behind a sign-in
  4. https://clearbit.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://clearbit.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Sales engagement: 37 of 58 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://clearbit.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: api.segment.io, cdn.segment.com, client-registry.mutinycdn.com, cta-service-cms2.hubspot.com, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, forms.hscollectedforms.net, forms.hsforms.com, js-na1.hs-scripts.com, js.hs-analytics.net, js.hs-banner.com, js.hscollectedforms.net, js.hubspot.com, o13610.ingest.sentry.io, perf-na1.hsforms.com, tag.clearbitscripts.com, x.clearbitjs.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Sales engagement: 2 of 58 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://clearbit.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Sales engagement: 3 of 53 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 8
✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://clearbit.com/subprocessors · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Sales engagement: 13 of 56 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording European Union, United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    The GDPR doesn’t require personal data of EU citizens and residents to be only stored within the EU.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

    Cloud and Network Architecture Clearbit utilizes Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform data centers located in the United States.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

Source: https://clearbit.com/trust · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Data location stated in Sales engagement: 24 of 57 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.clearbit.com/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Status page with history in Sales engagement: 19 of 56 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 63072000 seconds (730 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://clearbit.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://clearbit.com/

    max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://clearbit.com/

Source: https://clearbit.com/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Sales engagement: 38 of 59 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

  • Notice promised before the list changes 30 days.
    Show the exact wording

    de notice to Customer by updating this website not less than 30 days prior to the date on which the Subprocessor shall commence processing Customer Personal Data.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/subprocessors

Source: https://clearbit.com/subprocessors · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Sales engagement: 13 of 55 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page FedRAMP (unclear from the sentence), ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), PCI DSS (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (named without a certification claim). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 5 exact wordings

    managed in compliance with regulations, standards, and best practices, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, GDPR, CCPA, and PCI DSS Level 1.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

    esigned and managed in compliance with regulations, standards, and best practices, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, GDPR, CCPA, and PCI DSS Level 1.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

    th regulations, standards, and best practices, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, GDPR, CCPA, and PCI DSS Level 1.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

    Our security program is evaluated using AICPA’s SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria aligned with the controls contained in the COSO 2013 framework.

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

    Clearbit is SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant Security Clearbit has implemented a security strategy that is largely influenced b

    Read at https://clearbit.com/trust

Source: https://clearbit.com/trust · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Certifications named in Sales engagement: 26 of 58 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.9 %.
    Show the exact wording

    it agrees to provide access to the Services Clearbit API so that the Services will be available for 99.90% of the time during each calendar month (“Uptime”).

    Read at https://clearbit.com/sla

Source: https://clearbit.com/sla · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Sales engagement: 4 of 56 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://clearbit.com/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Sales engagement: 33 of 56 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-05: 65 of 1002026-10-12: 65 of 100 2026-10-05 2026-10-12
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Clearbit in: 65 (2026-10-05), 65 (2026-10-12).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Clearbit

8 found · 4 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-12.

Investigate 4 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  3. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  4. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.