SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Onsight

Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Onsight does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 55 that differ from Onsight on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Onsight has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Onsight does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Onsight does notOnsight publishes, and they do not
Showpadshowpad.com 65/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Lushalusha.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 1 Data location stated Compare
Clearbitclearbit.com 65/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 1 Public pricing Compare
Scratchpadscratchpad.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Apolloapollo.io 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Revenue.iorevenue.io 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Mindticklemindtickle.com 43/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Hunterhunter.io 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
ZoomInfozoominfo.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Mixmaxmixmax.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Gonggong.io 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Outreachoutreach.io 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.