SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Appointlet

Other Scheduling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Appointlet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Appointlet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Appointlet has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Appointlet” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AppointletFound at Appointlet, not found there
Reclaimreclaim.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Reclaim 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Calendlycalendly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calendly 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Cal.comcal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cal.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Chili Piperchilipiper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chili Piper 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
SavvyCalsavvycal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SavvyCal 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Motionusemotion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Motion 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
YouCanBook.meyoucanbook.meSee also Transparency alternatives to YouCanBook.me 35/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Timifytimify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timify 32/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Nowstanowsta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nowsta 30/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Acuity Schedulingacuityscheduling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acuity Scheduling 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Skeddaskedda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skedda 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Zcalzcal.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Zcal 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.