Transparency alternatives to Reclaim
Other Scheduling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Reclaim. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Reclaim on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reclaim has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Reclaim” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Reclaim | Found at Reclaim, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calendlycalendly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calendly | 65/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Cal.comcal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cal.com | 52/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Chili Piperchilipiper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chili Piper | 52/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SavvyCalsavvycal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SavvyCal | 52/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Motionusemotion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Motion | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Appointletappointlet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appointlet | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| SimplyBook.mesimplybook.meSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplyBook.me | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Timifytimify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timify | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| BookingLivebookinglive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BookingLive | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Doodledoodle.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doodle | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| TidyCaltidycal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyCal | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Setmoresetmore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setmore | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.