Transparency alternatives to Chili Piper
Other Scheduling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Chili Piper. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Chili Piper on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Chili Piper has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Chili Piper” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Chili Piper | Found at Chili Piper, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calendlycalendly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calendly | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cal.comcal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cal.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reclaimreclaim.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Reclaim | 78/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Motionusemotion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Motion | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Appointletappointlet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appointlet | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| TidyCaltidycal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyCal | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| SavvyCalsavvycal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SavvyCal | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SimplyBook.mesimplybook.meSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplyBook.me | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Timifytimify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timify | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| BookingLivebookinglive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BookingLive | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Zcalzcal.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Zcal | 26/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Picktimepicktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Picktime | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.